How many directors should a company have

Alternatively, and in any other case, allotment of further shares requires the approval of a majority of the shareholders. Capital contributions are not formally recognized under UK law. Funds can be repatriated via dividends or redemption of shares. The UK's capital maintenance rules can restrict a company's ability to repatriate funds. Shares are generally capable of being freely transferred subject to any restrictions contained in the company's articles. Such restrictions commonly take the form of pre-emption rights for existing shareholders, a right of the directors to refuse registration and outright prohibitions.

There are statutory pre-emption rights as per the Companies Act ; these can be disapplied by a company's articles of association. An overseas company can be registered using its corporate name its name under the law of the country of incorporation , or an alternative name under which it proposes to carry on business in the UK as long as:.

Generally not required. Firms in the financial or legal sector will typically impose their own KYC procedures. Articles of association may be amended with the approval of shareholders holding at least 75 percent of the voting rights of the company. No general business license required. Particular licenses or permits may be necessary to conduct certain activities in specific industries.

Shelf companies are no longer widely available. Companies can be incorporated within a few hours and electronically, so shelf companies are no longer commonly used. This website uses cookies to improve functionality and performance. If you continue browsing the site, you consent to the use of cookies on this website.

See our cookie policy for details. Form of entity Private limited company Separate and distinct legal entity. Public limited company A further alternative, being a public limited company, which is a company limited by shares or guarantee. Limited liability partnership Distinct legal entity separate from its members. Last modified 12 Jul Private limited company Separate and distinct legal entity.

Subject to certain exceptions such as fraud , shareholders are not liable for debts and obligations of the company Taxed on its earnings at a corporate level and shareholders taxed on any distributed dividends Management and organization governed by articles of association.

Not a separate legal entity. Represents a local registration of the overseas company Registration mandatory if operating an establishment in the UK. Registration must be effected within 1 month of opening the UK establishment.

Cost of registration subject to the country of incorporation of the overseas company Generally subject to UK corporation tax on any profits attributable to the establishment Generally subject to similar reporting requirements as a UK private limited company.

Requires a UK registered address If the overseas company is required by the laws of its country of incorporation to prepare annual accounts, such accounts must also be filed in the UK within a specified timeframe.

The accounts must relate to the overseas company as a whole, not just the UK establishment. Private limited company Companies must have a share capital, which can be any value above 0. Registered UK establishment Not applicable for this form of entity.

Private limited company Shareholders not liable for debts of the company. Limited liability partnership LLP Subject to certain exceptions such as fraud , members are not liable for debts and obligations of the company.

Registered UK establishment Subject to the requirements of the overseas company. Private limited company Company's profits taxed at 2 levels: Corporation tax is applied directly on the company's profits. Limited liability partnership LLP Generally taxed as a partnership. Registered UK establishment An overseas company is subject to corporation tax on its profits only to the extent that those profits are attributable to the UK establishment. Private limited company Delivery of Form IN01 containing details of company name, registered office, articles of association, directors, people with significant control, share capital and initial shareholdings and a memorandum of association to the Registrar of Companies.

Private limited company Well regarded and widely used. Limited liability partnership LLP Not as widely used as a private limited company. Registered UK establishment Not as well regarded and widely used as a private limited company.

Private limited company General meeting must be called upon the request of shareholders representing at least 5 percent of the paid-up share capital of the company carry voting rights.

Limited liability partnership LLP No shareholders. Members meeting requirements governed by LLP Agreement. Registered UK establishment Not applicable for this jurisdiction. Private limited company No statutory requirement to hold board meetings. Then, I shall discuss what directors do not do. Third, I shall identify the critical and controlling role of presidents.

And finally, I shall offer a five-point program for more active board involvement in large and medium-sized, widely held companies.

My study project covered a two-and-a-half-year period of concentrated and intensive field research interviews. During , , and , I conducted about seventy-five in-depth interviews and held several hundred shorter discussions with top business executives. Thus this is not a statistical study dependent upon questionnaires filled out by corporate respondents.

The size of the sample was such that a pattern became apparent, and I concluded that additional interviews would have added little of incremental value. However, there are certain limitations. For the most part, this study is concerned with large and medium-sized, widely held companies in which the president and the directors own little common or other voting stock.

Instances are included, though, where directors own or represent the ownership of large stock interests. This study is also confined exclusively to the boards of directors of manufacturing, mining, and retailing companies. In most companies, boards of directors serve as a source of advice and counsel, offer some sort of discipline value, and act in crisis situations —if the president dies suddenly or is asked to resign because of unsatisfactory management performance.

I found that most presidents and outside board members agree that the role of directors is largely advisory and not of a decision-making nature. Management manages the company, and board members serve as sources of advice and counsel to the management.

In addition, most presidents exploit the sources of advice represented on the board, both at board meetings and outside as well. And some thoughtful presidents, when selecting new members of the board to fill vacancies, identify the particular sets of desired qualities or areas of advice—general or specialized—which the presidents believe will add something to their management decisions. My field interviews turned up some interesting comments on the important function of the board in providing advice and counsel.

Here are two typical responses of the presidents interviewed:. A cabinet is an assemblage of sources of advice—the cabinet name is a good one for a board. All the rest of our job is to advise the management. The board rubber-stamps the action of management, and the board members are there to mollify the outside stockholders. Since typically directors do not devote substantial amounts of time to the affairs of the companies they serve, their advice cannot be of the sort which requires lengthy and penetrating analysis.

Accustomed, however, to dealing with top management problems involving sums of money and financial implications of considerable magnitude, directors, within the time constraints, can provide useful inputs to presidents willing to listen.

Outside directors are especially helpful in the advisory role where their general or specialized backgrounds and experiences can be applied to the specific management problems of the company served. For example, if new loans are to be negotiated or if new financing is to be arranged, these are the kinds of problems commonly faced by those on the board, and their judgments on interest rates or terms are useful to the president.

And if a new plant location, domestic or abroad, is involved in a request for a capital appropriation, members of the board with similar recent experience can often suggest useful and sometimes new factors bearing on the decision to commit large amounts of capital to a specific location. Occasionally, but only very rarely, the advice and counsel of a board member leads to a reversal of a management commitment or decision. A second role performed by boards of directors is serving as some sort of discipline for the president and his subordinate management.

The president and his subordinates know that periodically they must appear before a board made up largely of their peers.

I have found that even in those situations where top managements know from previous experience that members of the board will not ask penetrating, discerning, and challenging questions, considerable care is taken in preparing figures and reports for board meetings. Something in the way of discipline results simply from the fact that regular board meetings are held. Presidents and other members of top management in describing the discipline value of boards, indicated that the requirement of appearing formally before a board of directors consisting of respected, able people of stature, no matter how friendly, motivates the company managers to do a better job of thinking through their problems and of being prepared with solutions, explanations, or rationales.

There is a discipline factor here. We go to a lot of trouble to make sure that what we present to the board is well thought through and an attractively presented proposal—we want to manifest that the proposal is a product of thoughtful management. But I think we behave differently internally, knowing that we have outside directors. The mere existence of outside directors makes us think a little bit harder, makes us organize our thoughts. It sharpens up the whole organization.

The discipline value of boards also serves as an administrative device for presidents to use in establishing standards of performance for work done by subordinates.

For example, with capital appropriations on the agenda for the next board meeting, many presidents remind functional or divisional managers that market and financial justifications have to be carefully organized and documented so that there will be no possibility of embarrassing questions from board members.

If management did not have this requirement, I wonder what the ceiling or limits would be on what management might do. The conscience role of the board is a device that makes sure that homework is being done, and that criteria are thought through and proposed. The conscience function is involved in capital appropriations, operating budgets, compensation decisions, and others. Usually, the symbols of corporate conscience are more apparent than real, and presidents with complete powers of control make the compensation policies and decisions.

The compensation committee, and the board which approves the recommendations of the committee, are not decision-making bodies. These decisions are made by the president, and the committee and board approval is perfunctory. The president has de facto powers of control, and in most cases he is the decision maker.

The board does, I believe, tend to temper the inclinations of presidents with de facto control, and it does contribute to the avoidance of excesses. Thus it serves the important role of a corporate conscience. There are two critical states of corporate affairs in which the role of the board of directors is more than advisory. First, if the president dies suddenly or becomes incapacitated, the board has the decision-making responsibility to select his successor.

Only when confronted with the unexpected death of the president have they been propelled into a decision-making function. But the board is there—and it is legally constituted to pick a successor and to ensure the continuity of an entity organized to operate in perpetuity. The drama and trauma that develop when a board of directors has thrust upon it unexpectedly the complete de facto powers of control were illustrated during many of my field research interviews.

The dynamics of the assumption of all or part of the de facto powers of control by individual directors and combines of directors, in these situations, is worthy in my judgment of a separate study. Second, if the leadership and performance of the president are so unsatisfactory that a change must be made, the board of directors performs a decision-making role: here, the president is asked to resign—an important decision; and then the board must decide on his successor—an equally important decision.

I have concluded that generally boards of directors do not do an effective job of evaluating or measuring the performance of the president. Rarely are standards or criteria established and agreed upon by which the president can be measured other than by the usual general test of corporate profitability; and it is surprising how slow some directors are to respond to years of steadily declining profitability.

Since directors are selected by the president, and group and individual loyalties have been developed through working together, directors are reluctant to measure the executive performance of the president carefully against specific standards.

Directors base their appraisals largely on data and reports provided by the president himself. Also, top executives serving as outside directors, and being exceedingly busy men, typically do not devote time to pursue through further inquiry any concerns they may deduce from the data presented to them as directors, even when the concern might extend to the performance of the president.

In those situations where mounting and persuasive evidence leads individual directors or groups of directors to a conclusion that the president is unsatisfactory, I have found that one of three courses of action is usually followed:. Periodic management audits by consulting firms appear to be increasingly common and accepted by top executives even in highly successful enterprises.

This is the most common and typical response of directors who suspect or conclude that the president is unsatisfactory. Resignation from boards for a plausible reason, such as conflict of interest, enables a director to avoid facing the ultimate and inevitably unpleasant task of acting to replace a president.

Minimum number of directors required by law is 5. Maximum number of shareholders is unlimited, but minimum number required by law is At least 1 partner must be appointed as a manager and must have representation and binding authority on behalf of the company. No limit for maximum number of managers.

For directors, there is a statutory minimum requirement of 1, and there is no maximum number, all of which shall be natural persons. There is a statutory minimum requirement of 1 shareholder, and no maximum number. For directors, there is a statutory minimum requirement of 1 who must be a natural person and no maximum number.

The company's articles may contain additional stipulations. There is no maximum number of shareholders for a C corporation or for an LLC. For a corporation to be eligible for "S-corp" status, there is a maximum of shareholders.

Furthermore, there is no maximum number of directors for a corporation in most jurisdictions, though some states do have a maximum eg , in California, the stated maximum can't be greater than 2 times the stated minimum minus 1.

With respect to the number of shareholders of a JSC, please refer to the " Form of entity " section. This website uses cookies to improve functionality and performance. If you continue browsing the site, you consent to the use of cookies on this website. See our cookie policy for details. Last modified 9 Jun Directors shall last between one and three years in office, as provided in the bylaws. They may be re-elected.

The majority of the board of directors must be composed of Argentine residents. The president of the board is the legal representative of the company Statutory auditor is optional. Mandatory if capital stock exceeds ARS50 million Typical charter document: bylaws Corporate Books: stock ledger, shareholders' meeting minutes, board of directors' meeting minutes and attendance records book Should cash be paid out as consideration for the stock: only 25 percent must be paid up front, and the balance is paid within two years after that.

The majority of the board of directors must be composed of Argentine residents The president of the board is the legal representative of the company Permanent control by government Statutory auditor is mandatory at least one regular and one alternate statutory auditor Typical charter document: bylaws Corporate books: stock ledger, shareholders' meeting minutes, board of directors' meeting minutes and attendance records book Capital stock shall be fully paid up upon execution of bylaws SAUs are not allowed to be incorporated or wholly owned by another SAU Simplified Corporation Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada or SAS One or more shareholders The managers must be individuals, who may be appointed for an indefinite period.

At least one director must be an Argentinean resident provided that the Argentinian resident director is the legal representative of the company Statutory auditor is optional Corporate books: carried by electronic means stock ledger, minutes and attendance records book Should cash be paid out as consideration for the stock: only 25 percent needs to be paid up front, and the balance is paid within two years after that.

When considerations for the stock are contributions in kind, the stock must be fully paid off at the time of subscription of the shares Limited Liability Company Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada or SRL Two or more members The local management is in charge of single or several managers with full powers who may act individually, or a board of managers acting by majority. Managers may be appointed for an indefinite term.

The majority of the board of managers must be composed of Argentine residents The legal representative of the company may be a single manager. All managers or a president of the board of managers are entitled with full powers Statutory auditor is optional. Should cash be paid out as consideration for the stock: only 25 percent must be paid up front, and the balance is paid within two years after that. When considerations for the stock are contributions in kind, the stock must be fully paid off at the time of subscription of the shares.

Limited Liability Company Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada or SRL In case of SRLs, when articles allow distribution of management powers among individual members of the board of managers, the board's liability depends on the individual performance of each manager.

Simplified Corporation Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada or SAS This corporate type aims to be a more agile and economic alternative, both in its incorporation and in administration and management. Simplified Corporation Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada or SAS Required to hold an annual meeting of shareholders to approve financial statements of the company. All corporations must annually file tax returns with federal and state tax authorities.

Any corporate type shall file dissolution documents with the Public Registry. Not applicable for this jurisdiction. In some circumstances, the Tax Authority requires evidence of the declared domicile. Simplified Corporation Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada or SAS At least 1 director must be Argentinean resident provided that the Argentinean resident director is the legal representative of the company. Managers may be appointed for an indefinite term Last modified 9 Jun Limited Liability Company Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada or SRL The board makes decisions by a simple majority of the managers present at the relevant meeting, with a quorum of an absolute majority of total number of directors, unless the company's articles provide for a higher quorum and majority.

Minimum and maximum number of directors and shareholders. Branch Not applicable — this is subject to the requirements of the foreign company's place of incorporation. Proprietary company There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder and a maximum of 50 shareholders, not including employee shareholders. Public company There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder, and there is no maximum number.

Stock corporation AG There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder, and there is no maximum number. Limited liability company GmbH There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder, and there is no maximum number.

No minimum and maximum number of shareholders. A minimum of two shareholders. Foreign Branch Branch At least one director to be appointed by the parent company.

The sole director must be a public limited company with a collegial board when: The public limited company with the sole director is listed or When a legal provision requires a collegial board In the event of a dualistic board structure, both the board of supervision and the executive board must consist of at least 3 members who cannot be members of the board of supervision and the executive board at the same time.

Can be incorporated by only 1 shareholder. Belgian branch office of a foreign company A Belgian branch office has no directors. Limited liability company Sociedade Limitada There must be a minimum of one quotaholder, and no maximum number of shareholders.

The managers must be individuals resident in Brazil, which means that only Brazilian citizens or foreigners resident in Brazil under the status of a permanent visa are allowed to act as managers of an EIRIELI. Corporate subsidiary Corporation form rather than flow-through form There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder.

At least 3 directors for private corporations and simplified corporations by shares. General partnership Sociedad Colectiva There must be a minimum of 2 partners, and no maximum number. Limited partnership Sociedad en Comandita Simple y por Acciones There must be a minimum of 1 managing partner and 1 limited partner. Limited liability company Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada A minimum of 2 partners and a maximum of Simplified stock company Sociedad por Acciones Simplificada There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder with no maximum number.

Czech Republic. Limited liability company There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder, no maximum number and at least 1 managing director. Joint stock company There must be a minimum of 1 shareholder and no maximum number.

Limited liability company Kapitalselskab Only 1 shareholder is mandatory and there is no maximum of shareholders. The executive board may consist of minimum 1 person and there is no maximum. JSC Minimum of 3 shareholders and no maximum is required.

Minimum of 3 board members. LLC Minimum of 2 quotaholders and a maximum of If number of quotaholders is more than 10, control must be entrusted to a BoC, consisting of at least 3 quotaholders. Minimum 1 manager. OPC Wholly owned by 1 person; can be a natural or juridical person. Founder has overall management responsibility and may appoint manager s. Branch Shareholders are not applicable. At least 1 manager. RO Shareholders are not applicable. One manager. Minimum director requirements: one director and one deputy director.

Supervisory board: from 3 to 18 members. GmbH — limited liability company 1 shareholder. Hong Kong, SAR. Limited private companies A minimum of 1 shareholder and a maximum of 50 shareholders otherwise the company will become a public company. Private company limited by shares Zrt. There is no upper limit on the number of shareholders. Limited liability company Kft. There is no upper limit on the number of quotaholders. Private limited company There must be a minimum of 2 shareholders and a maximum of Limited liability company A company must have at least 2 shareholders with exceptions regulated in the Indonesian Company Law such as a state-owned company, a small-medium enterprise , 1 director and 1 commissioner, except for certain business activities which, for example, require at least 2 directors and 2 commissioners and to appoint an independent commissioner.

Private company limited by shares LTD Directors — minimum 1 and no maximum; however, a company's constitution may set an upper limit. Search blog: Search:. How many directors does a company need? Table of Contents. Previous Previous post: What does it mean to have shares in a company?

Related posts. The benefits of forming a Limited Liability Partnership 22 Feb How is a company formed? Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.