Whynot institute

They were simultaneously greatly influenced by Idealist notions of recriprocity. Rising generations of voters are now digitally native. They are used to managing their own data and to learning at speed from some of its insights. A personal citizenship account could consolidate personal, tax, and other data in one place. Across the lifespan though one could imagine a personalised provision of revolving resources restricted to assist with education or training, housing, social care and retirement.

It could be complemented with tax incentives and financial payments for specific needs or positive civic behaviours. Thus , in counties and cities where early years interventions might be crucial to mitigating future inequalities the personal account of a Fund member could be enhanced at the outset by DFE resources.

Some are trying to trick the dolphins into coming closer in hope of prolonging the encounter. While these are probably not the only reasons behind this kind of conduct, the results are always adverse.

This is why:. Why not to Feed Dolphins. This is why: Dolphins can get accustomed to receiving food and become increasingly dependent on humans to provide the next meal.

Human intervention most often presents a transient, unreliable food source which can suddenly become unavailable at their expense.

Current trial practice already encourages questioning expert witnesses on financial emoluments that might cloud their judgment. Yet exactly such emoluments can cloud the opinions of the lawyers who are even more central in the persuading. In understanding why an attorney construing his opponent's conduct seems to be steering them toward liability theory A and away from equally damning liability theory B, for example, jurors might find it helpful to know that theory A but not theory B triggers a statutory fee entitlement to the prevailing attorney.

Increasingly, defense as well as plaintiff's lawyers are accepting contingent fees; jurors might find it valuable to learn which lawyers are arguing on this basis, just as they benefit by knowing whether an investment advisor or car salesman is receiving a commission or operating on flat salary. Then there's the need for overall data collection. In recent years defenders of the litigation industry have selectively cited data from various sources by way of arguing that the industry's activities have plateaued: the litigation boom, they argue, is correcting itself.

Are they right? Lawmakers should take care that in an era of limited data budgets they do not wind up paying for a whitewash. The American Bar Association and academic commentators who've consistently minimized concern over litigation have been positioning themselves to supply the personnel and marching orders for data collection efforts if Congress is unwary enough to let them.

If the foxes are allowed to set up the video cameras in front of the coops, it is fairly certain that the tape will not catch them doing any fowlsnatching. One big step forward is a push in Congress for Form reporting of lawyers' contingency income law salaries and consulting fees are already subject to reporting.

Although one might assume attorneys would have a very high rate of tax compliance given their familiarity with the law, the IRS's Project Esquire found otherwise: around 10 percent did not even file returns. As legal reform proceeds, expect more proposals for fuller disclosure. One important measure is S. Disclosure is a central tenet of its "earlyoffer" provisions which seek to aid clients by identifying for their benefit how much of a settlement offer is "on the table" and how much of any claim therefore remains in dispute.

Better disclosure of the operations and growth of the litigation industry will furnish new raw material for reformist energy. It will make it easier, for example, for antitrust investigators to reach an informed judgment as to whether conscious parallelism in the setting of fees is consistent with current federal law. It will reveal patterns of abuse that could help energize bar and statecourt disciplinary panels, now often derided as toothless.

It will help resolve policy debates about the size and growth of the litigation sector. And it will also increase the amount of rough justice in the world—since those who live by extracting disclosures from others can hardly object if they're asked to start making disclosures of their own. Your current web browser is outdated. Creative Shed Agency www. We use MailChimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp for processing.

Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here. A de Castro had a dream to create a space for theatre and clowning practitioners as well as others to investigate, research, develop and progress in this art form. In , this dream became The Why Not Institute. The Why Not Institute creates a space for people to try out clowning; and for clowns to be recognised and validated.

If you know of anywhere that would be suitable for The Why Not Institute to move to contact us on whynotinstitute aol. Please share with anyone you think might be interested in helping us, with friends, family, newsletters, social media.